A Meta-Analysis of Time between Maternal Sensitivity and Attachment Assessments: Implications for Internal Working Models in Infancy/Toddlerhood

By L. Atkinson, A. Niccols, Angela Paglia, J. Coolbear, Kevin C. H. Parker, Lori Poulton, S. Guger, G. Sitarenios. 2000

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ce11f79884786817469e3b53d5801176a63c38c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Annie Bernier
2. Natasha Whipple
3. Geneviève A. Mageau
4. Robert J. Vallerand

In Social Psychology

1. Annie Bernier
2. Natasha Whipple
3. Christian Dormann
4. Geneviève A. Mageau
5. Robert J. Vallerand
6. Arnold B. Bakker
7. Clifford J. Mallett
8. Jacques Forest

Citations in the corpus

• Optimal time lags in panel studies. (2015, background): “…of actual panel studies, in which several meta-analyses have shown that effects erode as the time lag between two measurements increases (e.g., Atkinson et al., 2000; A. Cohen, 1993; Griffeth, Hom, & Gaertner, 2000; Holden, Moncher, Schinke, & Barker, 1990; Hom, Caranikas-Walker, Prussia, &…”
• Broadening the Study of Infant Security of Attachment: Maternal Autonomy-Support in the Context of Infant Exploration. (2011, methodology): “Two other meta-analyses yielded similar conclusions, finding that the link between maternal sensitivity and infant attachment is robust but smaller in magnitude than what was originally thought (Atkinson et al., 2000a; Goldsmith & Alansky, 1987).”