Polanyi Symposium: a conversation on embeddedness

By Greta R. Krippner, Mark S. Granovetter, F. Block, N. Biggart, Thomas D. Beamish, You-tien Hsing, G. Hart, G. Arrighi, M. Mendell, John R Hall and 3 more. 2004

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a0555de2821ed31e1da58a87a6bd17654f7930c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

For Polanyian Economic Geographies (2013, background): “…a talismanic fi gure in the new economic sociology, albeit one often (mis)read by proxy, courtesy of Mark Granovetter’s programmatic intervention (Krippner et al, 2004), while hovering in the background in the literatures on regulation theory and varieties of capitalism (Hollingsworth and…”
Markets as configurations (2011, background): “(2) A theory of the market should acknowledge economic sociology’s (Granovetter, 1992; Krippner et al., 2004) suggestions that economic action is embedded in networks of social relationships, i.”
Exploring the paradox of competence‐creating subsidiaries : balancing bandwidth and dispersion in MNEs (2014, background): “See Krippner et al (2004) for a discussion.”
Market and society : the great Transformation today (2009, methodology): “I have looked back at my old notebooks and found that I used the term embeddedness in some of my early notes, before I ever read Polanyi” (Krippner et al. 2004: 113).”
Economic Sociologies in Space (2005, background): “…revealed that the traffic has largely been in one direction, with economic sociologists engaging selectively with the economics literature, while mainstream economists have largely remained in their own world (Baron and Hannan 1994; Davern and Eitzen 1995; cf. Swedberg 1990; Krippner et al. 2004).”
Karl Polanyi and the antinomies of embeddedness (2007, background): “The second part of Block’s assertion can easily be witnessed by the number of interpretations that the concept of embeddedness has provoked (Reddy, 1984; Granovetter, 1985; Stanfield, 1986; Zukin and DiMaggio, 1990; Lie, 1991; Barber, 1995; Beckert, 1996; Krippner, 2001; Le Velly, 2002; Block, 2003;”
Calculators, Lemmings or Frame-Makers? The Intermediary Role of Securities Analysts (2007, background): “…overlooking the social determinants of value, a proper sociological understanding of markets should expand the theoretical scope of ‘the social’ to encompass how collectively constructed calculative technology shapes the encounter between information and prices (Stark, 2000; Granovetter, 2004).”
Work, employment and society through the lens of moral economy (2013, background): “Here, market and society are constructed as separate spheres that operate by satisfying requests of the external environment through identifying that environment’s distinctive logics and codes (Beckert, 2009a; Krippner et al., 2004; Parsons, 1991).”
Moral economy: Rethinking a radical concept (2016, unknown): “…stressing the ‘cultural’ or ‘moral’ aspects of market transactions does not imply disregarding the underlying logics of market transactions themselves –a tendency that has produced views of the market that are as ‘disembedded’ as those of orthodox economists (Krippner, 2001; Krippner et al., 2004).”