The moderating effect of gender in the adoption of mobile banking

By Hernan Riquelme, Rosa E. Rios. 2010

710 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Media Technology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79bb009240942979a32eb8f18c6edf0cab488af8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Media Technology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Consumer adoption of mobile banking in Jordan: Examining the role of usefulness, ease of use, perceived risk and self-efficacy (2016, background): “Nevertheless, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness would not be able to provide a clear picture of explaining individual intention and behaviour-related technology (Gu et al., 2009; Luarn and Lin, 2005; Riquelme and Rios, 2010; Shareef et al., 2014; Zhou, 2011).”
An investigation of users’ continuance intention towards mobile banking in China (2016, background): “…and Rios, 2010; Koenig-Lewis et al., 2010; AI-Jabri and Sohail, 2012): (decomposed) theory of planned behavior (DTPB/TPB) (Brown et al., 2003; Riquelme and Rios, 2010; Puschel et al., 2010; Sripalawat et al., 2011): and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) (Tan et al.,…”
Mobile-banking adoption by Iranian bank clients (2014, background): “Riquelme and Rios (2010) investigated the moderating effect of gender in the adoption of mobile banking.”
Mobile Money and Financial Inclusion in Sub-Saharan Africa: the Moderating Role of Social Networks (2018, background): “Riquelme and Rios (2010) suggest that the extent to which consumers use mobile technology as a medium of transaction is affected by the opinions of their families, relatives, and friends.”
Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust (2017, background): “The selection of social influence as a key determinant of the behavioural intention is built on prior literature which supports the impacting role of social influence on customers’ propensity to use online banking channels (Alalwan et al., 2016b; Martins et al., 2014; Riquelme and Rios, 2010; Yu, 20”
Tourists’ Destination Loyalty through Emotional Solidarity with Residents: An Integrative Moderated Mediation Model (2018, background): “Scholars studying consumer behavior in marketing and hospitality have acknowledged and examined the gender differences related to loyalty formation and future behavior (Kolyesnikova, Dodd, and Wilcox 2009; Riquelme and Rios 2010).”
Determinants of Mobile Banking Adoption in the Ghanaian Banking Industry: A Case of Access Bank Ghana Limited (2015, background): “Results obtained from this research attest to the findings of the authors in [47] [56] that, social influence has a significant”
Adoption Intention of Fintech Services for Bank Users: An Empirical Examination with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (2019, background): “Users’ perceived ease of use (PEU) has a positive impact on perceived usefulness (PU) related to the use of Fintech services.”