The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991
By Jay B. Barney, Mike Wright, Dave J. Ketchen. 2001
3,527 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/798773d2986eeafffca8beb88fa395dadcd01920
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Mike Wright
- K. Meyer
- Mike W. Peng
- Silvio Vismara
- David Urbano
- David B. Audretsch
- Igor Filatotchev
- Massimo G. Colombo
In Strategy and Management
- Mike Wright
- K. Meyer
- Mike W. Peng
- Angappa Gunasekaran
- Igor Filatotchev
- Carlos M. P. Sousa
- Dave J. Ketchen
- David Urbano
Citations in the corpus
- The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective (2005, background): “Because the business model encompasses competitive advantage, it also draws on resource-based theory (Barney et al., 2001).”
- The influence of internal and external firm factors on international product adaptation strategy and export performance: A three-country comparison (2006, background): “Borrowing from the resource-based view (RBV) of firms (Barney, 1991; Barney et al., 2001) and industrial organization-based (IO) theory (Bain, 1951, 1956), our conceptual framework posits that a firm’s internal (Barney, 1991) and external characteristics influence product adaptation strategy and, he”
- Agency, Strategic Entrepreneurship, and the Performance of Private Equity–Backed Buyouts (2009, positive): “These findings add to the buyout and private equity literature since they provide more fine-grained insights than hitherto about how some private equity firms are more skilled at implementing otherwise common monitoring and advisory devices (Barney et al., 2001).”
- Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for sustainability research in marketing (2011, background): “Resource-based view of the firm The resource-based view of the firm, which envisions firms as a bundle of resources, is probably the dominant theory for explaining differences in performance among firms today (Barney et al. 2001).”
- An institutional theory perspective of business continuity planning for purchasing and supply management (2005, background): “…theoretical frameworks such as institutional theory (Grewal and Dharwadkar 2002, DiMaggio and Powell 1983), the resourcebased view of the firm (Barney et al. 2001, Barney 1991, Wernerfelt 1984), contingency theory (Donaldson 2001), and transaction cost analysis (Chiles and McMackin 1996,…”