A Gender Audit for Public Transport: A New Policy Tool in the Tackling of Social Exclusion

By K. Hamilton, L. Jenkins. 2000

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Gendered travel mode choice: a focus on car deficient households (2012, background): “There are a number of key hypotheses that may be drawn from work on gender difference in travel behaviour (for discussions see Camstra, 1996; Law, 1999; Hamilton and Jenkins, 2000; Clark and Wang, 2005; Crane, 2007).”
Gendered key events in the life course: effects on changes in travel mode choice over time (2014, background): “…to be complementary rather than competitive with no author championing one hypothesis to the exclusion of all others (see Hanson and Pratt, 1995; Law, 1999; MacDonald, 1999; Hamilton and Jenkins, 2000; Blumen, 2000; Clark and Wang, 2005; Crane, 2007; Sandow, 2008 for wellbalanced discussions).”
Commuting Time and Household Responsibilities: Evidence Using Propensity Score Matching (2016, unknown): “For instance, it could be that, due to their household responsibilities, women may be more likely than men to use public transport (Schulz and Gilbert, 1996; Doyle and Taylor, 2000; Hamilton and Jenkins, 2000; Hoedemaeker et al., 2012; Sánchez de Madariaga, 2013).”
Examining women's perception of safety during waiting times at public transport terminals (2020, background): “Transport is a critical means by which people are able to reach opportunities provided by a city (Hamilton and Jenkins, 2000; Levy, 2013).”