Trust: Reason, Routine, Reflexivity

By J. Kidd. 2006

381 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7933286d6cfad98a6bc85d86839530f8f61fb034

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

At What Level (and in Whom) We Trust (2012, background): “…to perceptions, beliefs, or expectations about the trustee’s intention and being able to rely on the trustee, and willingness to accept vulnerability, which generally refers to suspension of uncertainty (Möllering, 2006) or an intention or a decision to take risk and to depend on the trustee.”
Heading into the unknown: Everyday strategies for managing risk and uncertainty (2008, background): “Given the pre-rational, intuitive, and reflexive knowledge embedded in trust, the argument that trust is characterised by a leap of faith (Moellering 2006, pp. 109–110) which bridges a knowledge gap with hope or belief may actually be reproducing the orthodox distinction between rationality and…”
A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations (2009, background): “…110–111) calls " suspension, " namely, the attitude that enables participants to suspend " irreducible social vulnerability and uncertainty as if they were favorably resolved " (Möllering 2006, p. 111) and maintain a state of favorable expectation toward the other (see also Sawyer 2003, p. 101).”
Trust and distrust: Polar opposites, or independent but co-existing? (2014, methodology): “, 2010), with qualitative data offering additional explanatory capability (Möllering, 2006; Saunders et al., 2010). In particular, in-depth interviews have allowed clarification of meanings from quantitative data (Nooteboom, 2006), through ‘empirically mining for explanations’ (Currall and Inkpen, 2”
The meaning of risk-taking – key concepts and dimensions (2019, background): “Trust expresses a lack of knowledge and control and has been characterised as a ‘leap of faith’ (Möllering 2006).”
All you need is trust? A critical review of the trust and entrepreneurship literature (2012, background): “This also implies that trust can be socially constructed, emerging through individual and collective sense-making and interpretation (Lewis, 2008; Möllering, 2006).”
The Great Transformation of Embeddedness: Karl Polanyi and the New Economic Sociology (2007, positive): “Trust is a crucial facilitator of cooperation since market actors must take risks when engaging in exchange (Gambetta 1988; Möllering 2006).”
Consensus on conceptualizations and definitions of trust: Are we there yet? (2015, background): “…1998 ); describing the trustor as being willing to rely upon, give control to, support, or otherwise “be vulnerable to” the trustee (Bachmann, 2011 ; Schoorman et al., 2015 ); or describing the “reciprocal” (Lewis & Weigert, 1985 ; Li, 2015 ) or “refl exive” (Möllering, 2006 ) nature of trust.”
Trust in work teams: An integrative review, multilevel model, and future directions (2018, background): “A willingness to accept vulnerability refers to suspension of uncertainty by assuming that another’s actions would be beneficial, favorable, or at least not detrimental (Mayer et al., 1995; Möllering, 2006; Robinson, 1996).”
The Importance of Trust for Investment: Evidence from Venture Capital (2016, background): “Guiso, Sapienza and Zingales (2006), Möllering (2006), and Nooteboom (2002) review this literature from different angles.”
Market and society : the great Transformation today (2009, background): “Trust is a crucial facilitator of cooperation since market actors must take risks when engaging in exchange (Gambetta 1988a; Möllering 2006).”
Managing Organizational Change: Negotiating Meaning and Power-Resistance Relations (2011, background): “…practices produces what we refer to as a relational engagement , by which we mean that both parties take active responsibility for the joint tasks in which they are involved and suspend “irreducible social vulnerability and uncertainty as if they were favorably resolved” (Möllering, 2006:110-1).”