The Revised Cyber Bullying Inventory (RCBI): validity and reliability studies

By Çigdem Topçu, Özgür Erdur-Baker. 2010

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The aim of this study is to revise Cyber Bullying Inventory (CBI) and to examine its basic psychometric characteristics. There were two independent samples. First sample consisting of 358 participants (178 female, 178 male, 2 unknown) aged 13-21 (M = 16.58; SD = 1.42) was used to test preliminary validity and reliability tests. Confirmatory analyses were conducted with the second data set which consisted of 339 participants (220 female, 117 male, 2 unknown) aged 13-21 (M = 17.07; SD = 1.45). RCBI appears to be a valid and reliable tool which can be utilized safely among Turkish adolescents to investigate the nature and extent of cyber bullying experience.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/786b058f56bd586d540745d7faaa680c311eaddf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. W. Cassidy
2. J. Kerslake
3. Gayle Brewer
4. Chantal Faucher
5. M. Jackson

In Education

1. W. Cassidy
2. J. Kerslake
3. Gayle Brewer
4. Chantal Faucher
5. M. Jackson

In Social Psychology

1. W. Cassidy
2. J. Kerslake
3. Gayle Brewer
4. Chantal Faucher
5. M. Jackson

Citations in the corpus

• Cyberbullying among adolescents: Measures in search of a construct. (2014, unknown): “…such as principal components or exploratory factor analyses to identify factor structure (e.g., Ang & Goh, 2010; Cetin et al., 2011; Law, Shapka, & Olson, 2010; Law, Shapka, Domene, & Gagné, 2012a; Law, Shapka, Hymel, Olson, & Waterhouse, 2012b; Topcu & Erdur-Baker, 2010; Werner et al., 2010).”
• Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice (2013, background): “It is important to recognize that the topic of online interaction is renewed every day, so tools aimed at assessing cyberbullying need to be less focused on particular applications than on the underlying behaviours (Topçu & Erdur-Baker, 2010).”
• Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness (2015, methodology): “Participants completed the Revised Cyber Bullying Inventory (RCBI, Topcu & Erdur-Baker, 2010), the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Russell, Peplau, & Ferguson, 1978), Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ, Spreng, McKinnon, Mar, & Levine, 2009) and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965) online.”