Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area.

By Robert Cervero, Michael Duncan. American Journal of Public Health, 2003

915 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77850441c399a8193a9e0a63f396e4ff3a0faa67

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Carsharing and sustainable travel behavior: Results from the San Francisco Bay Area (2016, background): “…as well as disadvantages (carsharing utilization rates are unknown). behavior, with residents of higher-density neighborhoods owning fewer vehicles and driving less than those in lower-density, single-family neighborhoods (Crane & Crepeau 1998, Cervero & Duncan 2003, Cao et al. 2009).”
The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. (2011, background): “8,40,53,68 For example, the state of disrepair of green space negatively affects its use by making it feel less safe.”
Impact of Everyday Weather on Individual Daily Travel Behaviours in Perspective: A Literature Review (2013, background): “Remarkably, Cervero and Duncan (2003), based on household activity survey data from San Fransisco, find no precipitation effect on cycling, whereas they do find an effect on walking.”
Analyzing the Effect of Bicycle Facilities on Commute Mode Share over Time (2009, background): “Other researchers have offered more general theories to explain induced cycling use Pikora et al. 2003 and have even tested such claims Cervero and Duncan 2003 .”
Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach (2007, background): “…have found that residents living in traditional neighborhoods (characterized as high density, high accessibility, mixed land uses, rectangular street network, and so on) drive less and walk more than those living in suburban neighborhoods (e.g., Cervero and Duncan 2003; Crane and Crepeau 1998).”
Examining the Impacts of Residential Self‐Selection on Travel Behaviour: A Focus on Empirical Findings (2009, background): “Numerous studies have observed that residents of higher-density, mixed-use (‘traditional’, ‘neo-traditional’ or ‘new urbanist’) neighbourhoods tend to walk more and drive less than do inhabitants of lower-density, single-use residential (‘suburban’) areas (e.g. Crane and Crepeau, 1998; Cervero and D”
Walkable streets: pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes (2008, background): “Specifically, Cervero and Duncan (2003, p. 1483 ) suggest that quantitative studies and statistical analyses “should be supplemented by micro‐level analyses, including qualitative case studies and quasi‐experimental comparisons, that account for possible influences of street‐scale design elements.”
Promoting walking and bicycling: assessing the evidence to assist planners (2010, background): “For example, Cervero and Duncan (2003) analyzed two-day travel diaries and built environmental features using GIS to uncover that only land-use mix was a statistically significant predictor of walking trips.”
Travel and the Built Environment (2010, background): “…2006 225 light rail transit stations in 11 metropolitan areas A LNR ST/LS no Cervero, 2007 26 TODs in five CA regions D LGR SE/ LS/WP/AT yes Cervero & Duncan, 2003 San Francisco Bay Area, CA D LGR SE/OT no Cervero & Duncan, 2006 San Francisco Bay Area, CA D LNR SE/WP no Cervero &…”
Residential self-selection effects in an activity time-use behavior model (2009, background): “... Schwanen and Mokhtarian (2005a), Khattak and Rodriguez (2005), Bagley and Mokhtarian (2002), Handy et al. (2005), and Krizek (2000, 2003) for analyses of residential self selection in models of travel mileage by one or more modes; Cervero and Duncan (2002), Hammond (2005), Pinjari et al. (2007),”
Modeling the choice continuum: an integrated model of residential location, auto ownership, bicycle ownership, and commute tour mode choice decisions (2011, background): “Another such model is presented by Eliasson and Mattsson (2000). More recently, Salon (2006) completed a doctoral dissertation that explores the relationship between the transportation and land use system in New York City by modeling the transportation and residential location choices of New Yorkers”