Attentional biases for negative interpersonal stimuli in clinical depression.
By Ian H. Gotlib, E. Krasnoperova, D. N. Yue, Jutta Joormann. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2004
984 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7771bd642eaca89ed0b4b72e436a474fee023a2d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Diego A. Pizzagalli
- L. Carstensen
- Ian H. Gotlib
- Mara Mather
- Christopher G. Beevers
- Jutta Joormann
- Tony T. Wells
- David H. Zald
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Diego A. Pizzagalli
- Ian H. Gotlib
- Jutta Joormann
- Christopher G. Beevers
- Tony T. Wells
- Emily A P Haigh
- A. Beck
- Mara Mather
Citations in the corpus
- An evaluation of early and late stage attentional processing of positive and negative information in dysphoria (2007, background): “Gotlib and colleagues have replicated their findings a number of times, in both clinically depressed patients (McCabe & Gotlib, 1995 ) and previously depressed patients (McCabe et al, 2000 ; see, however, Gotlib, Krasnoperova, Yue, & Joormann, 2004 , for a recent non-replication using the dot-pro”
- Biased attention and dysphoria: Manipulating selective attention reduces subsequent depressive symptoms (2010, methodology): “The relatively longer stimulus durations compared to standard dot-probe administrations (e.g., Gotlib et al., 2004) were intended to allow participants time to more fully process the content of the stimuli, as longer durations may allow for more elaborated processing and greater activation of…”
- Reconsidering Anhedonia in Depression: Lessons from Translational Neuroscience (2010, background): “This is broadly consistent with a thoroughly documented negative response bias in MDD, a hypersensitivity to punishment, and a tendency to remember negative information (Gotlib et al., 2004a; Gotlib et al., 2004b; Joormann et al., 2006; Surguladze et al., 2004).”
- Aging and Attentional Biases for Emotional Faces (2003, background): “Like younger adult controls in studies of depressed or anxious participants’ attentional biases (e.g., Bradley et al., 2000; Gotlib et al., 2002), the younger adults in our study did not show any significant attentional biases.”
- Brain structural and functional abnormalities in mood disorders: implications for neurocircuitry models of depression (2008, background): “In a face dot-probe task designed to assess the allocation of attention between a face with a neutral expression and a face with an emotional expression, individuals with MDD consistently attend preferentially to faces with sad expressions (Gotlib et al. 2004a, b).”
- Internet-Based Attention Training for Social Anxiety: A Randomized Controlled Trial (2012, background): “At presentation times of 1,000 ms or more, patients with SAD showed no attention bias (Using faces: Gotlib et al. 2004; Using words: Musa et al. 2003).”
- Children’s coping with peer rejection: The role of depressive symptoms, social competence, and gender (2006, background): “Neither level of perceived social competence, nor the interaction between CDI and competence score was related to anticipated mood impact ratings.”
- Frontocingulate Dysfunction in Depression: Towards Biomarkers of Treatment Response (2010, background): “…in disengaging from and inhibiting negative cues (Goeleven et al, 2006; Koster et al, 2005; Lau et al, 2007), potentiated interference from negative distractors (Gotlib et al, 2004), amplification of the significance of failure (Wenzlaff and Grozier, 1988), and ‘catastrophic’ reactions to errors.”