Anticipated guilt as behavioral motivation an examination of appeals to help unknown others through bone marrow donation

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How Emotion Shapes Behavior: Feedback, Anticipation, and Reflection, Rather Than Direct Causation (2007, unknown): “Experimental evidence of the positive power of anticipated guilt was provided by Lindsey (2005).”
Emotions Matter in Crisis (2011, background): “Lindsey (2005) also showed that different message frames of bone marrow donation advertising induced different levels of guilt feelings.”
A 50-Year Review of Psychological Reactance Theory: Do Not Read This Article (2017, methodology): “For instance, Lindsey (2005) created a four-item measure based on the HPRS (Hong & Faedda, 1996), but despite its potential utility, it was not developed further (Quick et al., 2013).”
The role of discrete emotions in health outcomes: A critical review (2007, background): “In addition to encouraging the avoidance or cessation of unhealthy behaviors, guilt may also motivate health-promoting behaviors (Lindsey, 2005).”
The Persuasive Effects of Message Framing in Organ Donation: The Mediating Role of Psychological Reactance (2007, methodology): “Anticipated guilt was theorized by Lindsey (2005) to be guilt that people predict feeling when they consider inaction.”