The Persuasive Effects of Message Framing in Organ Donation: The Mediating Role of Psychological Reactance
By Amber M. Reinhart, Heather M. Marshall, Thomas Hugh Feeley, Frank Tutzauer. 2007
230 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/740b29ee6a00a2c99336e293d3ba0fb7067b27b3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Social Psychology
- Richard E. Petty
- P. Briñol
- J. Teeny
- Joseph J. Siev
- Tobias Reynolds-Tylus
- Ofir Turel
- Yufei Yuan
- Zhengchuan Xu
Citations in the corpus
- A Review and Conceptual Framework for Understanding Personalized Matching Effects in Persuasion (2020, background): “Other research has shown that matched messages can generate a negative meaning if they are interpreted as an attempt at manipulation (Bri~ nol et al., 2015; David et al., 2012; Reinhart et al., 2007), or if they are interpreted to be based on an unfair or stereotypic judgment about the person (Derri”
- Psychological Reactance and Persuasive Health Communication: A Review of the Literature (2019, background): “, 2019), narrative appeals (MoyerGusé and Nabi, 2010; Gardner and Leshner, 2016), messageinduced empathy (Shen, 2010, 2011), gain-framed messages (Reinhart et al., 2007; Cho and Sands, 2011; Shen, 2015), novel messages (Quick, 2013), other-referencing messages (Gardner and Leshner, 2016), and inocul”
- Online game addiction among adolescents: motivation and prevention factors (2012, background): “In such cases they may ignore persuasive attempts and experience instead a boomerang effect, where they do the opposite of the intended behavior advocated by the persuasive messages or acts (Reinhart et al, 2007).”
- Attitudes and Donation Behavior When Reading Positive and Negative Charity Appeals (2018, background): “For example, one study demonstrated that positive gain-framed messages produced more favorable attitudes toward organ and tissue donations than loss-framed messages and that psychological reactance and perceived manipulative intent mediated this effect (Reinhart et al., 2007).”