Australian covert bullying prevalence study

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Victims’ perceptions of traditional and cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates of their victimisation (2012, background): “…is in contrast to studies where students have expressed the opinion that cyberbullying is harsher than traditional bullying because of the possible anonymity of the bully, that it is hard to get away from the cyberbully and that cyberbullies can be nastier (Cross et al. 2009; Spears et al. 2009).”
Beyond the 'digital natives' debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences (2010, background): “Cross et al, 2009), to idealisations of a new generation of highly motivated, highly technologised learners (eg., Lorenzo et al, 2007).”
Learning Deep on Cyberbullying is Always Better Than Brute Force (2017, background): “Some re- ported that CB happens for up to eight percent of children in schools in: Australia [Cross et al., 2009], United States [Kowalski and Limber, 2007], or Finland [Sourander et al., 2010].”
National Safe Schools Framework: Policy and practice to reduce bullying in Australian schools (2011, background): “…Bullying Prevalence Study (ACBPS) commissioned by the Australian government to redress the lack of nationally representative evidence describing the nature and prevalence of bullying, particularly covert bullying, and to provide a foundation for informed policy and practice (Cross et al., 2009).”