Some Empirical Aspects of Multi-sided Platform Industries

By David S. Evans. 2003

584 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Media Technology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7616b37e96785e0b237a70bddb8bcff769a0fe85

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Media Technology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Two-sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts (2007, background): “As Evans (2003a) notes, a feature of many two-sided markets is that agents on one or both sides of the market multihome.”
A holistic market conceptualization (2015, background): “Multi-sided platform markets have different groups that businesses have to secure in order to succeed (Boudreau and Hagiu 2009; Evans 2003).”
An Empirical Analysis of Payment Card Usage (2007, background): “The broader issue of network effects is a well-studied phenomenon with early theoretical papers dating back to Rolffs (1978), Katz and Shapiro (1985) and Farrell and Saloner (1985). See Shy (2001) for an introduction and overview of this literature.”
Price structure in two-sided markets: Evidence from the magazine industry (2006, unknown): “See also Evans (2003a, 2003b).”
One-side value-added service investment and pricing strategies for a two-sided platform (2016, background): “Therefore, the strategy for one side has a great influence on the strategy for the other (Evans 2003; Rochet and Tirole 2003).”
Scoping the Sharing Economy: Origins, Definitions, Impact and Regulatory Issues (2016, methodology): “12 As illustrated by Evans (2003b) network externalities and economies of scale may favour a situations with larger and fewer platforms but several factors may offset them such as congestion, heterogeneity, and multi-homing.”
Lean government and platform-based governance - Doing more with less (2013, background): “Recent platforms are labeled as multi-sided platforms, as platform creates value by facilitating interactions between the different (or multiple) groups of actors (Evans, 2003).”
Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Review of Its Managerial Intellectual Structure and Potential Evolution in the Service Industries (2019, background): “…examination of the role of digital entrepreneurs as well as distributed agency in digital platforms and ecosystems (e.g., Eisenmann et al., 2011; Evans, 2003; Evans and Schmalensee, 2016; Hagiu, 2014; Nambisan, 2017; Nambisan et al., 2019; Parker and Van Alstyne, 2018; Rochet and Tirole, 2006)…”
A business case for Smart Grid technologies: A systemic perspective (2011, methodology): “Open platforms can be profitable to attract new players on board, foster competition in the platform ecosystem and enable participation of players in different competing platforms (multi-homing) (Evans, 2003).”
The Future of Work in the ‘Sharing Economy’. Market Efficiency and Equitable Opportunities or Unfair Precarisation? (2016, unknown): “…2003, 2006) and was used later by Wright (Wright, 2004) and Armstrong (Armstrong, 2006) In parallel, Evans used the expression ‘two-sided platforms’ (Evans, 2003a, 2003b) and was one of the first to systematically apply this perspective to what he called the web economy (Evans, 2008a, 2008b,…”
The digital platform: a research agenda (2018, background): “Two-sided markets bring together (or match) two distinct groups in a relationship where the value for one group increases as the number of participants from the other group increases (Evans, 2003; Eisenman et al., 2006).”