The strategy of affect: Emotions in human cooperation.

By Daniel M.T. Fessler, K. Haley. 2003

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7603fc92c403295dfb183680cdaa9d869ff067ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Admiration: A Conceptual Review (2016, background): “(2011) Prototypicality Positive Onu et al.”
From appeasement to conformity: Evolutionary and cultural perspectives on shame, competition, and cooperation. (2007, background): “Fitness-enhancing punitive behavior is motivated by a discrete emotion, moral outrage (Fessler & Haley, 2003); consistent with the above argument, subjects report more moral outrage at norm violations when observers are present than when they are alone (Haley, in prep.).”
Normative Bias and Adaptive Challenges: A Relational Approach to Coalitional Psychology and a Critique of Terror Management Theory (2005, background): “…view in which emotions are seen as the products of specialized adaptations crafted by natural selection, with each emotion addressing a discrete class of adaptive challenges (Cosmides and Tooby, 2000; Fessler and Haley, 2003; Frank, 1988; Izard, 1977; Johnston, 1999; Nesse, 1990; Weisfeld, 1997).”
Reputational benefits for altruistic punishment (2006, background): “However, if punishment signals prosocial qualities like trustworthiness or commitment to a group (Fessler & Haley, 2003), then punishers should be deemed more trustworthy, group focused, and worthy of respect than nonpunishers.”
The science of religious beliefs (2008, background): “Cosmides and Tooby (1992, 2005), for instance, have proposed and defended the existence of a universal cheater-detection device,3 while Fessler and Haley (2003) have examined many universal emotions such as gratitude and anger as evolved cognitive mechanisms designed for the purposes of encouraging…”
How emotion communication guides reciprocity: Establishing cooperation through disappointment and anger (2009, background): “Nevertheless, some scholars propose that anger may have evolved to address defection in an interaction partner (Fessler & Haley, 2003; Keltner et al., 2006).”
Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. (2005, background): “…the affective systems motivating prosocial behavior serve the ultimate goal of creating and maintaining individually profitable social relationships (Fessler & Haley, 2003), then human perceptual and decision making systems ought to be especially sensitive to cues of the presence of others.”
Cooperation in primates and humans : mechanisms and evolution (2006, background): “Emotions may play a decisive role here (Fessler & Haley 2003) and negative emotions, in particular, may provide a proximate explanation.”
Monetary sacrifice among strangers is mediated by endogenous oxytocin release after physical contact (2008, unknown): “This suggests a role for emotions in sustaining cooperation as others have noted (Fessler & Haley, 2003; Hirshleifer, 1987; Frank, 1988), as high densities of OT receptors are found in brain regions associated with emotions (Gimpl & Fahrenholz, 2001; Verbalis, 1999).”