The Ecocultural Framework, Ecosocial Indices, and Psychological Variables in Cross-Cultural Research
By J. Georgas, F. V. D. van de Vijver, John W. Berry. 2004
216 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/751a7d6477cf4ea75c317d79671bf7d8c14081c5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Dianne A. van Hemert
- Y. Poortinga
- F. V. D. van de Vijver
- Simcha Ronen
- Oded Shenkar
- Ronald Fischer
- K. Leung
- Dirk T. Tempelaar
In Sociology and Political Science
- Dianne A. van Hemert
- Y. Poortinga
- F. V. D. van de Vijver
- Simcha Ronen
- Oded Shenkar
- Ronald Fischer
- K. Leung
- Onne Janssen
Citations in the corpus
- Mapping world cultures: Cluster formation, sources and implications (2013, background): “Georgas and Berry (1995) concluded that cluster analysis is the best method to investigate concepts such as dimensions of nations, which are so complex and undifferentiated, and composed of so many interrelated variables, that a clear factor solution is virtually impossible.”
- Variation in Raven's Progressive Matrices scores across time and place (2009, unknown): “…characteristics related to the education in each country, such as illiteracy, rates of enrollment into education (the proportions of the population in a particular country that is enrolled in primary, secondary, and tertiary education), and the number of pupils per teacher (Georgas et al., 2004).”
- Emotion and culture: A meta-analysis (2007, methodology): “( 2004 ) found two bipolar factors based on the seven value dimensions, ie, autonomy (ranging from conservation to affective and intellectual autonomy) and hierarchy (ranging from harmony to mastery and hierarchy).”