A study of the impact of three leadership styles on integrity violations committed by police officers

By Leo C. E. Huberts, M. Kaptein, K. Lasthuizen. 2007

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/748886dd2ef685520f02f8c946b730d62d84793c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. L. Heres
2. K. Lasthuizen
3. Leo C. E. Huberts

In Information Systems and Management

1. L. Heres
2. K. Lasthuizen
3. Leo C. E. Huberts

In Sociology and Political Science

1. L. Heres
2. Leo C. E. Huberts
3. K. Lasthuizen
4. J. Schafer

Citations in the corpus

• How to Measure Integrity Violations (2011, methodology): “This first typology by Huberts (1998) was later adapted and extended, to include both police and local government organizations.”
• Effective leaders and leadership in policing: traits, assessment, development, and expansion (2010, background): “, 1994; Smith, 1984), the use of force (Engel, 2000), and officer misconduct (Bittner, 1983; Brehm and Gates, 1993; Brown, 1988; Huberts et al., 2007; Reiss, 1971), though inconstant findings abound (see, Allen, 1982; Allen and Maxfield, 1983; Brehm and Gates, 1993; Brown, 1988; Engel, 2002; Mastrof”