Power in global value chains

By M. Dallas, S. Ponte, T. Sturgeon. Review of International Political Economy, 2019

289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Power has been a foundational concept in global value chain (GVC) research. Yet, in most GVC scholarship, power is not explicitly defined and is applied as a unitary concept, rather than as having multiple dimensions. Clarifying the concept of power has become particularly urgent in recent years as GVC research has proliferated beyond dyads of transacting firms or firm-state linkages and incorporated other stakeholders and mechanisms such as NGOs, labor unions, standards, norms and conventions. In this article, we propose a typology for the varied meanings and usages of power in GVC governance. We delineate two principal dimensions: transmission mechanisms – direct and diffuse; and arena of actors – dyads and collectives. Combined, these two dimensions yield four ideal types of power in GVC governance: bargaining, demonstrative, institutional and constitutive. We offer brief illustrations of these four types of power and provide an agenda for further research in the field.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/743c444134e59eb343986bd702e8cb7882514415

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

Roger Strange

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Research on international business: The new realities (2021, background): “Inward FDI was generally perceived to be a “good thing” for most host countries, bringing benefits in terms of output, employment and technology transfer,3 with countries competing to secure the most attractive 1 See Buckley and Casson (2021) for a comprehensive history of IBR and an analysis of the”