Research Synthesis AAPOR Report on Online Panels

By Reg Baker, S. Blumberg, J. Brick, Mick Couper, Melanie Courtright, J. M. Dennis, D. Dillman, M. Frankel, Philip Garland, R. Groves and 9 more. 2010

548 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

National Culture and Social Desirability Bias in Measuring Public Service Motivation (2016, background): “With respect to concurrent and predictive validity, the report indicates that more accurate results are expected due to lower measurement error (or at least a small difference between the two survey modes; Baker et al., 2010, p. 742).”
Does Adherence to Masculine Norms Shape Fathering Behavior (2018, methodology): “These strategies were employed in accordance with the best practices in online data collection guidelines set forth by the American Association for Public Opinion Research (Baker et al., 2010).”
A Tale of Two Sample Sources: Do Results from Online Panel Data and Conventional Data Converge? (2018, background): “Further, Bprofessional^ panel members, that is, members who participate in many surveys or belong to more than one panel, might maximize their income by speeding through surveys with little attention to the accuracy of their responses (Baker et al., 2010; Smith & Hofma Brown, 2006; Sparrow, 2007).”
Urban air pollution in China: destination image and risk perceptions (2017, unknown): “There could be significant coverage error and high level of non-responses in building a nonprobability panel (Baker et al., 2010).”