Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment
By C. Mortimore. 2001
1,246 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Epidemiology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Sofia Tagini
- José Manuel Rodríguez-Sánchez
- Daniel Adrover-Roig
- Marcos Ríos-Lago
- A. Williams Andrews
- I. Sánchez-Cubillo
- Jose A. Periáñez
- Francisco Barceló
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sofia Tagini
- José Manuel Rodríguez-Sánchez
- Daniel Adrover-Roig
- Marcos Ríos-Lago
- A. Williams Andrews
- F. Ostrosky-solis
- I. Sánchez-Cubillo
- Jose A. Periáñez
In Epidemiology
- Sofia Tagini
- José Manuel Rodríguez-Sánchez
- Daniel Adrover-Roig
- Marcos Ríos-Lago
- A. Williams Andrews
- I. Sánchez-Cubillo
- Jose A. Periáñez
- Francisco Barceló
Citations in the corpus
- Hooper Visual Organization Test (2017, background): “More recent normative data are available in Mitrushina et al. (2005) and Strauss et al. (2006).”
- Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs. (2006, background): “The FTT is believed to be one of the most sensitive neuropsychological tests for determining brain impairment (Mitrushina et al., 1999).”
- Cognitive testing toward the future: The example of Semantic Verbal Fluency (ANIMALS) (2006, background): “During the last decades, psychology and neuropsychology have been significantly interested in developing reliable and valid enough cognitive testing procedures (eg, Lezak, 2004 ; Mitrushina, Boone, & D'Elia, 1999 ; Spreen & Strauss, 1998 ; Wechsler, 1997 ).”
- Meta-analysis of intellectual and neuropsychological test performance in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. (2004, methodology): “However, because these measures are sometimes considered to be language and not executive function measures (Mitrushina et al., 1999; Spreen & Strauss, 1998), analyses were performed with and without these measures.”
- Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. (2011, background): “As such, an individual’s gait speed can be interpreted relative to a criterion reference or a normative reference [10,11], the focus of this meta-analysis.”
- Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. (2004, methodology): “Since this literature has been amply summarized in several handbooks ( Lezak, 1995; Mitrushina et al., 1999; Spreen & Strauss, 1998 ), it will not be reviewed further. In using the norms, it should be noted that the influence of age and education is not equivalent on Trails A and B. On Trail A, perf”
- Thinking in Pictures as a Cognitive Account of Autism (2011, result): “Moreover, both the Rey and Benton tests have been found, in TD individuals, to be correlated with the Block Design subtest of the Wechsler scales and not correlated with verbal measures (Mitrushina et al. 2005; Strauss et al. 2006), and the Block Design subtest has been commonly cited as an area of ”
- The Stroop Color and Word Test (2017, methodology): “Lastly, we excluded six Stroop Test manuals, since not entirely procurable (Trenerry et al., 1989; Artiola and Fortuny, 1999; Delis et al., 2001; Golden and Freshwater, 2002; Mitrushina et al., 2005; Strauss et al., 2006a).”
- Construct validity of the Trail Making Test: Role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities (2009, methodology): “The Trail Making Test (TMT) is one of the most widely used instruments in neuropsychological assessment as an indicator of speed of cognitive processing and executive functioning (AITB, 1944 ; Lezak, 1995 ; Mitrushina et al., 2005 ; Reitan, 1992 ; Strauss et al., 2006 ).”