Cognitive testing toward the future: The example of Semantic Verbal Fluency (ANIMALS)
By A. Ardila, F. Ostrosky-solis, B. Bernal. 2006
211 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/863cd6a93a1c5fee070be30a5b74bc27a6005060
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Yoed N. Kenett
- Roger E. Beaty
- Miriam Faust
- David Anaki
- Paul J Silvia
- Ute Römer
- Matthew Brook O'Donnell
- Nick C. Ellis
Citations in the corpus
- Structure and flexibility: Investigating the relation between the structure of the mental lexicon, fluid intelligence, and creative achievement. (2016, methodology): “According to standard procedure (Ardila et al., 2006), participants had 60 seconds to generate as many animal category members they could think of.”
- The processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency and prototypicality (2014, background): “…the frequency with which words are produced across participants provides an index of their prototypicality and further that the order in which words are produced in the fluency task provides an index of the semantic distance between the items generated (Ardila et al. 2006; Crowe and Prescott 2003).”