Acculturation and Prejudice in Germany: Majority and Minority Perspectives

236 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Prejudice And Minority Proportion: Contact Instead Of Threat Effects (2006, background): “Nonetheless, official policy until very recently has denied that Germany is a state of immigration (see Zick et al. 2001).”
Population Ratios and Prejudice: Modelling Both Contact and Threat Effects (2010, background): “It also means that ideologies of assimilation and segregation held by the host population closely relate to attitudes toward immigrants (Zick et al. 2001).”
Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: A social identity perspective (2006, background): “Research has examined various correlates of multicultural attitudes, such as demographic variables (gender, age, region, level of education), perceived life opportunities and economic conditions, interethnic friendships, and individual difference variables such as authoritarianism, social dominance,”
Attitudes toward Immigrants, Immigration, and Multiculturalism in New Zealand: A Social Psychological Analysis 1 (2008, unknown): “In addition, they are significantly more likely to favor integration than assimilation or separation as an acculturation strategy for immigrants – in marked contrast to the preference for assimilation in both Germany and the Netherlands (Van Oudenhoven, Prins, and Buunk, 1998; Zick et al., 2001).”