Infant Negative Emotionality, Caregiving, and Family Relationships
By A. Crouter, A. Booth. 2003
89 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/737c3f2fe1139e4042385586d5da2ce8320a3dc3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- N. Eisenberg
- Natalie D. Eggum
- Tracy L. Spinrad
- Melissa A. Barnett
- Jacob E. Cheadle
- Jennifer A. Mortensen
- Paul R. Amato
- Jean Decety
Citations in the corpus
- Maternal Responsiveness and the Development of Directed Vocalizing in Social Interactions (2014, background): “In addition to infant stable characteristics such as child temperament (Crockenberg & Leerkes, 2003) and gender (Weinberg, Tronick, Cohn, & Olson, 1999), infant dynamic behaviors that are continually changing over development also have an effect (Vallotton, 2009).”
- Teacher–Child Interactions in Infant/Toddler Child Care and Socioemotional Development (2015, background): “Temperamentally reactive children may display intense levels of emotional arousal and negativity, posing distinct caregiving challenges (Crockenberg & Leerkes, 2003).”
- Parental Divorce, Marital Conflict and Children's Behavior Problems: A Comparison of Adopted and Biological Children (2008, background): “(For a review of these perspectives, see Ambert 2001; Crouter and Booth 2003.)”
- The Family Alliance Assessment Scales: Steps Toward Validity and Reliability of an Observational Assessment Tool for Early Family Interactions (2011, background): “Now, studies have shown how an infant’s temperament and behavior can also exert an impact on its caregivers (Crouter and Booth 2003; Lewis and Rosenblum 1974), an impact which is more and more strategic and goal-oriented as the child grows (Cole 2003).”
- Emotion-Related Self-Regulation and Its Relation to Children’s Maladjustment (2010, background): “…are unregulated, in comparison to those who are more regulated, may elicit different responses from their social environment, such as hostility from peers and adults and lower-quality social interactions (Belsky et al. 2007, Bridgett et al. 2009, Crockenberg & Leerkes 2003, Eisenberg et al. 2008).”