Corruption, Income Distribution, and Growth

By Hongyi Li, Lixin Colin Xu, HENG-FU ZOU. 2000

557 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7367e2951bbaa80b931ddc9fff87aeced0dd3b5c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Inflation, Growth, and Income Distribution: A Cross-Country Study (2002, methodology): “Data description We use data averaged over 5-year periods in our empirical analysis, as is done in other empirical studies; see Li, Squire, and Zou (1998); Li and Zou (1998); Li, Xu, and Zou (2000); and Li, Xie, and Zou (2000).”
The Comparative Politics of Corruption: Accounting for the East Asian Paradox in Empirical Studies of Corruption, Growth and Investment (2004, background): “As is typical of crosscountry regression studies of corruption (Knack & Keefer, 1995; Li et al., 2000; Mauro, 1995) initial regressions focus on the re-scaled redefined regional corruption variables on the dependent variables.”
Corruption, economic growth, and income inequality in Africa (2002, background): “The growth effect is similar in sign, but larger in magnitude than has been estimated by earlier researchers (Tanzi and Davoodi 1997; Tanzi 1998; Mauro 1995; Gupta et al. 1998; Li et al. 2000; Rose-Ackerman 1997; Shleifer and Vishny 1993, among others).”
DOES CORRUPTION AFFECT ECONOMIC GROWTH (2012, background): “Mauro (1995) and Li et al. (2000) show that”
Privatization, Competition, and Corruption: How Characteristics of Bribe Takers and Payers Affect Bribe Payments to Utilities (2002, unknown): “Using enterprise-level data on bribes paid to utilities in 21 transition economies in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, we examine how characteristics of the utilities taking bribes and the firms paying bribes affect the equilibrium level of corruption in the sector.”
Corruption, Growth, and Income Distribution: Are there Regional Differences? (2006, background): “Some researchers (Gupta et al. 2002; Li et al. 2000; Hendriks et al. 1998; Jain 2001; Johnston 1989) argue that corruption increases income inequality through several channels.”
Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption (2009, result): “The research data about patent activity in lesser developed nations is also consistent with this hypothesis (da Motta e Albuquerque, 2000; Lerner, 2002; Wade, 2003).”
Exploring corruption practices in public procurement of infrastructural projects in Ghana (2010, background): “Indicators of weak governance in both the public and private sectors include an absence of laid-down procedures for procurement and tender, non-enforcement of laid-down control principles, abuse of managerial powers, lax supervision, non-existence of codes of conduct, and improper payments and accou”
The relationship between corruption and income inequality in U.S. states: evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model (2010, background): “Using data from a mixed group of countries (i.e., low, middle, and high-income), Li et al. (2000) and Chong and Calderon (2000) find an inverse U-shaped relationship between corruption and income inequality.”
The challenge of poor governance and corruption (2005, background): “Corruption levels help explain Gini differentials within Latin America, the OECD, and Asia, but they do not explain the large Asia\Latin American differences in Gini coefficients or the intercontinental differences in growth rates (Li, Xu, and Zou 2000).”