The Multinational Enterprise: Market Failure and Market Power Considerations
By David J. Teece. 2008
164 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73137ea9febad0d1162fb17c650939ae33db79c9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Economics and Econometrics
In Strategy and Management
- Christos N. Pitelis
- David J. Teece
- Sascha Kraus
- Tina C. Ambos
- Beate Cesinger
- Felix Eggers
- Bernard Marr
- Chander K. Velu
Citations in the corpus
- The (New) Nature and Essence of the Firm (2009, background): “Notwithstanding the widely recognized importance of innovation, the further development of the Coasian framework by Oliver Williamson (1975, 1985) and Klein, Crawford, and Alchian (1978) focused on asset specificity as the driver of internalization (Williamson, 1985; Monteverde and Teece, 1982).”
- A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise (2014, unknown): “Because the market for information/ knowledge about new opportunities (Gans & Stern, 2010; Teece, 1981b) isn’t well developed, entrepreneurs and managers must build organizational capabilities inside businesses firms to assist in knowledge creation and knowledge capture (Teece, 1986b, 2006b).”
- Distance and Perceptions of Risk in Internationalization Decisions (2015, background): “These perspectives comprise classical location theory (Vernon, 1966), foreign trade theory (Heckscher, 1919), transactioncost theory (Teece, 1981), the OLI paradigm (ownership–location– internalization-specific advantages) (Dunning, 1980), the Uppsala model (Johanson & Vahlne, 1977, 1990),…”