Above and Below Left–Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations

By Jonathan Haidt, Jesse Graham, Craig Joseph. 2009

430 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/730e0493849020a880e7a1ce11c28604b0bda100

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

MTurk Character Misrepresentation: Assessment and Solutions (2017, neutral): “Haidt, Graham, and Joseph 2009).”
Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism (2012, background): “Criterion 5: Evolutionary model Kin selection: Hamilton (1964); Attachment theory: Bowlby (1969) Reciprocal altruism: Trivers (1971) Multilevel selection: Wilson (2002); Tribalism: Richerson and Boyd (2005) Rank and dominance: de Waal (1982) and Boehm (1999) Disgust: Rozin, Haidt, and McCauley (2008”
How social class shapes thoughts and actions in organizations (2011, positive): “The authors noted that ‘‘one surprise of the current study was the large difference between social classes, which was in most cases larger than the differences among the cities’’ (Haidt et al., 1993, p. 625). In another investigation, higher class students at a public U.S. university were more permi”
Intuitive Ethics and Political Orientations: Testing Moral Foundations as a Theory of Political Ideology (2017, background): “Conservatives have their dials set more equally across all five foundations, though some research finds conservatives higher on the binding foundations (Graham, Haidt, and Nosek 2009; Graham et al. 2011).”
Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory: Do Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences in “Moral” Intuitions? (2014, methodology): “…and enforcement of purity concerns are every bit as valid, well-intentioned, and morally defensible as so-called ''liberal'' intuitions associated with the valuation of fairness and avoidance of harm (e.g., Graham et al., 2009; Haidt, 2008, 2012; Haidt & Graham, 2007; Haidt et al., 2009 ).”
Moral Support: How Moral Values Shape Foreign Policy Attitudes (2014, background): “Under the moral foundation of fairness/reciprocity, individuals should be treated equally; to deny a person such equality is to treat them unfairly and unjustly (Graham, Haidt, and Nosek 2009).”
Psychological Pathways to Fraud: Understanding and Preventing Fraud in Organizations (2011, methodology): “Haidt et al. (2009) and Graham et al. (2009) argue that there are five different moral foundations upon which cultures or groups create their definition of morality: (1) harm, care, and altruism (people are vulnerable and often need protection); (2) fairness, reciprocity and justice (people have…”
Moral Foundations and Heterogeneity in Ideological Preferences (2013, background): “These predictions follow from the strong link between moral traditionalism and the binding foundations suggested by earlier research (e.g., Haidt et al., 2009).”