QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH CARE: ANALYZING QUALITATIVE DATA

By C. Pope, S. Ziebland, N. Mays. 2000

3,481 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71ff9f3ff107e4d92f8b2c4330a76bed34ee0e49

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Femmephobia: The Role of Anti-Femininity and Gender Policing in LGBTQ+ People’s Experiences of Discrimination (2019, unknown): “In other words, themes were driven by the data and evolved through the coding process, but were also developed from theoretical interest and to answer the research question (Braun and Clarke 2006; Pope et al. 2000).”
‘Doing’ health policy analysis: methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges (2008, methodology): “In an approach similar to that employed in framework analysis (Pope et al. 2000), a series of general and then increasingly more specific questions were elaborated, enabling testing of alternative explanations of phenomena.”
Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas (2012, methodology): “The five neat stages of framework analysis described for primary research [18] are in practice a more iterative process for making sense of a pile of studies [19].”
A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis (2003, methodology): “It is very similar to the general pattern of qualitative data analysis described by others (e.g., Miles & Huberman, 1994, p. 9; Pope et al, 2000).”
A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data (2006, background): “It is consistent with the general patterns of qualitative data analysis described by other authors (e.g., Miles & Huberman, 1994, p. 9; Pope et al., 2000, Punch, 1998).”
Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice (2012, background): “Framework synthesis has evolved from framework analysis employed for policy relevant primary research where urgency requires rapid results that can be delivered by large teams (Ritchie and Spencer 1994, Pope et al. 2000).”
The Experiences of Late-diagnosed Women with Autism Spectrum Conditions: An Investigation of the Female Autism Phenotype (2016, methodology): “We adhered to guidelines for good practice in qualitative research (Mays and Pope 2000; Pope et al. 2000; Stiles 1999) by conducting the following credibility checks, to ensure that interpretations of the data were sound and fair.”