A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis

By D. Thomas. 2003

1,098 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/14e9ff983ad232a8969d3252dc2cf482dd97b39a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Applying Constant Comparative Method with Multiple Investigators and Inter-Coder Reliability (2016, background): “Independent coding by outside researchers can enhance the trustworthiness of CCM data analysis to provide a powerful boost to construct validity (Thomas, 2003).”
An Informal Science Education Program’s Impact on STEM Major and STEM Career Outcomes (2020, methodology): “An independent coder was provided with approximately 20% of the raw text that was previously coded and asked to assign each section of this text to the selected categories (Thomas 2003).”
Science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge development during enactment of socioscientific curriculum materials (2019, background): “This inductive approach (Thomas, 2003) lead us to illuminate the most significant indicators for strong, intermediate, and weak PCK development for SSI teaching.”
Limits and Possibilities for “Ethical AI” in Open Source: A Study of Deepfakes (2022, methodology): “After data collection, all interviews were transcribed, and then the first author examined possible relationships between themes in this analytic memo, iteratively going back to the data to test out these possible structures, before settling on an inductive hierarchical coding frame [48, 54, 76].”
Help-seeking among Male Farmers: Connecting Masculinities and Mental Health (2014, unknown): “ A set of validity criteria were utilized to assure the scientific quality of the study (Shek, Tang & Han, 2005; Thomas, 2003; Whittemore, Chase & Mandle, 2001).”