The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship

By Bart Clarysse, Valentina Tartari, Ammon J. Salter. 2011

505 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71d27c6e1e194308b12b47a016cce07779d46805

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

The Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intention of Young Researchers: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior with the Triple Helix Model (2019, background): “First, despite the increased attention on the issue of academic entrepreneurship (Clarysse, Tartari, and Salter 2011; Fini et al. 2011; Meoli and Vismara 2016; Siegel and Wright 2015), only a few studies devote explicit attention to the determinants of academic entrepreneurial intention (AEI)…”
Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations (2017, background): “2016; Rizzo 2015) so that their identities can also be expected to be heterogeneous (Clarysse et al. 2011).”
Uncertainty, Knowledge Problems, and Entrepreneurial Action (2018, background): “In this sense, complex environments are thought to be difficult for entrepreneurs to compete within because they invoke an inability to identify all of the relevant factors that might influence the actions of the entrepreneurs and because they pose inherent difficulties for determining how these fac”
The Influence of Gender on Entrepreneurial Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceptual Factors (2016, background): “Some studies in the entrepreneurship field have shown that the ability to recognize opportunities increases the probability of people becoming entrepreneurs (Baron and Ensley, 2006; Casson and Wadeson, 2007; Clarysse et al., 2011).”
Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university's structural configuration on third mission performance (2019, background): “An important set of empirical studies in the scientific literature has used HE-BCI as a reliable source of information to capture third mission activities of UK universities (e.g. Abreu and Grinevich, 2013; Clarysse et al., 2011; Geuna and Rossi, 2011; Guerrero et al., 2015; Sánchez-Barrioluengo et ”
Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer (2013, unknown): “Clarysse et al. (2011) The TTO’s role in increasing entrepreneurial activities of academics appears to be limited.”
Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study (2016, background): “Further, the opportunity recognition capacity and prior entrepreneurial experience of individual academics are the strongest predictors of quality new spin-off creation (Clarysse et al. 2011).”
The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship (2017, unknown): “Focusing on how individual factors shape UK academics’ decisions to found new companies, Clarysse, Tartari, and Salter (2011) find that an academic’s opportunity recognition capacity and his/her prior entrepreneurial experience are the most important predictors of academic entrepreneurship, and are…”
Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature (2018, background): “…increases alongside age (e.g., Aldridge and Audretsch 2011; Ambos et al. 2008; Bergmann et al. 2016; Grimm and Jaenicke 2012; Haeussler and Colyvas 2011; Müller 2010; Oehler et al. 2015), which is related to academic rank (Clarysse et al. 2011a RP) and seniority (Rasmussen et al. 2014).”
Emergence of entrepreneurial behaviour: The role of age-based self-image (2015, background): “As younger adults accumulate human, social and financial capital through work experience and education, their perceived ability to behave entrepreneurially becomes stronger (Clarysse, Tartari, & Salter, 2011; Mayer-Haug, Read, Brinckmann, Dew, & Grichnik, 2013).”
University support and the creation of technology and non-technology academic spin-offs (2016, background): “Second, at the organizational level, empirical evidence shows that the large increase in the creation of academic spin-offs is related to the pressure faced by universities to commercialize their research results in different forms, including spin-offs (Clarysse et al. 2011; Djokovic and Souitaris 2”
Founding team composition and early performance of university—Based spin-off companies (2014, background): “2003), on the availability of support from industry and venture capitalists at the regional level (e.g., Clarysse et al., 2011; Fini et al., 2011; Van Geenhuizen and Soetanto, 2009), on the functioning of technology parks (Hansson et al., 2005; Link and Scott, 2007) or on motivations, personality…”
Determinants of innovativeness in SMEs: disentangling core innovation and technology adoption capabilities (2017, background): “This will promote creativity (Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995; Galende and De la Fuente, 2003), the discovery of business opportunities (Clarysse et al., 2011), and the entrepreneur’s capacity for technological absorption (Hoffman et al., 1998).”