Dilemmas in qualitative health research
By Lucy Yardley. 2000
2,558 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/714cb21d79ff2bc69bfa7905984bc419a429fc12
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In General Health Professions
- Daniel Sousa
- Jonathan A. Smith
- L. Tindall
- N. Clarke
- Alison Wearden
- J. Brocki
- C. Harwood
- David Uzzell
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- An Exploration of Psychological Well-being with Young Somali Refugee and Asylum-seeker Women (2005, methodology): “…(iii) triangulation between group and individual data, outliers and informants (Yardley, 2000); (iv) presenting initial findings back to participants (Elliott, Fischer, & Rennie, 1999); (v) reverse validity checks; and (vi) four independent assessments of transcripts and themes (Yardley, 2000).”
- Trade unions and climate change : The jobs versus environment dilemma (2011, methodology): “Qualitative data are collected selectively according to the research question (Lincoln and Guba, 1985; Styles, 1993; Spencer et al., 2003; Yardley, 2000) Yardley (2000) suggests that conducting and analysing qualitative research should be based on four broad principles: sensitivity to context;…”
- Deconstructing the complex perceptions of gender roles, gender identity, and sexual orientation among transgender individuals (2012, background): “Also, a larger sample size would have lent itself to a more comprehensive (Yardley, 2000) overview of themes and the ability to address the research question from multiple viewpoints of transgender individuals who may or may not be seeking sex reassignment surgery.”
- An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Stress and Coping in First Year Undergraduates. (2013, neutral): “Quality Various criteria have been suggested for evaluating the quality of qualitative research, for example, Henwood and Pidgeon (1992), Elliott et al., (1999), and Yardley (2000).”
- A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology (2006, methodology): “The centrality of researcher subjectivity in this kind of work means that traditional research evaluation criteria such as representative samples and appropriate statistical analyses are irrelevant (Touroni and Coyle, 2002; Yardley, 2000).”
- Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool. (2012, background): “Yardley [22] highlights a number of challenges for quality assessment in qualitative research, many of which are addressed to some extent in the QATSDD.”
- Assimilation and Accommodation Processes Following Traumatic Experiences (2007, background): “It is emphasized that interpretations made are likely not the only ones possible; however, attempts to enhance validity were made following well-established guidelines for qualitative research (Stiles, 1993 ; Elliot, Fischer, & Rennie, 1999 ; Yardley, 2000 ).”
- J.A. Smith, P. Flower and M. Larkin (2009), Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. (2009, positive): “Consequently, the authors present a specific approach to assessing validity produced by Yardley (2000 ), which comprises four principles to be used when assessing qualitative work: sensitivity to context, commitment and rigor, transparency and coherence, and impact and importance.”
- The relationship between motivations of architectural designers and environmentally sustainable construction design (2016, neutral): “However, lack of subjectivity does not mean lack of validity and many scholars have proposed criteria for evaluating the validity of qualitative research (Henwood and Pidgeon, 1992, Yardley, 2000, Willig, 2001).”
- Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020, background): “researchers design their studies and help audiences differentiate high- from low-quality research (Bauer et al., 2000; O’Brien et al., 2014; Popay et al., 1998; Seale & Silverman, 1997; Yardley, 2000).”