Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union

By A. Moravcsik. 2002

764 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70e63e8b1ace4d577df298b0ea050c36f7413c0d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. V. Schmidt
2. F. Scharpf
3. D. Stasavage
4. M. Höpner
5. Armin Schäfer
6. A. Moravcsik
7. R. Keohane
8. Thomas Oatley

In Political Science and International Relations

1. V. Schmidt
2. F. Scharpf
3. M. Höpner
4. Armin Schäfer
5. D. Stasavage
6. A. Kay
7. Robert Ackrill
8. R. Keohane

In Safety Research

1. F. Scharpf
2. V. Schmidt
3. D. Stasavage
4. M. Höpner
5. Armin Schäfer

Citations in the corpus

• Open-Door or Closed-Door? Transparency in Domestic and International Bargaining (2004, background): “…2000; Jacobsson and Vifell 2003; and Wallace 2002+ For discussions of the EU’s democratic deficit more generally, see Hix 1999; Habermas 1998; and Moravcsik 1994, 2002+ not shared by all observers+ Moravcsik argues that concerns about the lack of transparency of EU institutions such as the…”
• Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism (2009, background): “…their governments but place greater trust in multilateral aid organizations that are accountable to their member states collectively rather than 41+ Moravcsik 2002+ A notable exception, namely the Common Agricultural Policy, proves the proverbial rule—farming is a case in which a special…”
• The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited (2006, background): “The multiple-veto character of EU policy-making in the intergovernmental and joint-decision modes more or less ensures that policies on which Commission, Council and European Parliament are in fact able to agree, are unlikely to lack legitimacy under this criterion (Moravcsik, 2002).”
• Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’ (2013, background): “…the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and other regulatory bodies; to the policy outcomes of the EU’s multiple veto structures taken as a whole (e.g. Moravcsik 2002); as well as to the community enhancing performance of the policies themselves (e.g. Menon/Weatherill 2008; Caporaso/Tarrow 2008).”
• Ambiguity, multiple streams, and EU policy (2013, background): “At the same time, there continue to be debates over the extent to which the EU suffers from a democratic deficit (e.g., Crombez 2003; Moravcsik 2002).”
• A New Phase of European Integration: Organised Capitalisms in Post-Ricardian Europe (2010, background): “However, one might object, it is so obvious that the member states are deadlocked with immobility and overregulation that the ‘neo-liberal bias of the EU, if it exists, is justified by the social welfarist bias of current national policies’ (Moravcsik 2002: 618).”