The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited
By F. Scharpf. 2006
331 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b640961c954c530c48b67088354fdf7b89dcf13
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- How likely is it that the European Union will disintegrate? A critical analysis of competing theoretical perspectives (2014, background): “…disintegration would be a slow process of attrition, in which ever greater difficulties in adopting new legislation went hand-in-hand with ‘an erosion of the existing acquis through creeping non-compliance and “institutional hypocrisy”’ (Iankova and Katzenstein, quoted in Scharpf, 2006: 858).”
- Innovations in climate policy: the politics of invention, diffusion, and evaluation (2014, background): “Policy innovation: key concepts and processes In the policy sciences and governance work more generally, policy innovation is commonly treated not just as any dependent variable, but one of the most important (Tsebelis 1995, Heritier 1997, Scharpf 2006, Ostrom 2010).”
- Embeddedness and Regional Integration: Waiting for Polanyi in a Hayekian Setting (2012, background): “…a federation, agreement could be reached on the use of tariffs for the protection of particular industries,” Hayek 1980, 263 wrote; “@t#he same applies to all other forms of protection+” 49+ See Scharpf 1999, 2006, and 2009+ See also the seminal articles by Weiler on the distinction between…”
- Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems: sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals (2017, background): “First, if different levels of governance opt for conflicting policies, the result can be leakages, meaningless certification, policy incoherence, unnecessary duplication of efforts, counterproductive actions, and/or complete gridlock.(3,4,28,50) Second, competition between levels and/or responsibili”
- A New Phase of European Integration: Organised Capitalisms in Post-Ricardian Europe (2010, positive): “For example, the European Commission and the ECJ regularly used EU competition policy to push for economic liberalisation whenever they were able to decide without the agreement of the Council of Ministers (Scharpf 2006 : 853; Thatcher 2007 : 157).”
- The Asymmetry of European Integration - or why the EU cannot be a Social Market Economy (2010, background): “…attempts to remove national barriers to trade through legislative harmonization continued to be severely impeded by the ‘joint decision trap’ (Scharpf, 1988, 2006), whereas ‘integration through law’17 was able to move forward without political interference through the seemingly inexorable…”