The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought: Author index

1,068 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

No Innate Number Line in the Human Brain (2011, background): “…these (and other) mechanisms for imagination in many conceptual domains and through various theoretical and empirical methods, from cross-cultural and cross-linguistic studies to experiments in psycholinguistics and cognitive neuroscience, to computer modeling (for an overview, see Gibbs, 2008).”
Sensory marketing, embodiment, and grounded cognition: A review and introduction (2014, background): “Depending on theoretical perspective, metaphors are either seen as the unique driver of the observed effects (Lakoff, 2008; Lakoff & Johnson, 1999) or as expressions of the multimodal nature of mental representations (Anderson, 2010; Barsalou, 2008; Williams et al., 2009).”
Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics (2011, neutral): “(Tendahl and Gibbs 2008: 1824)”
The Metaphor–Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy (2013, background): “…EFFECT FOR CAUSE metonymy (on schematic metonymies, see Ruiz de Mendoza & Mairal, 2007) and given that behavioral responses function as metonymies in emotion concepts (Kövecses, 1986, 1990, 2000, 2008; Lakoff & Kövecses, 1987), we get the specific metonymy DOWNWARD BODILY ORIENTATION FOR SADNESS.”