The Third Food Regime: Neoliberal Globalism and Agricultural Biotechnology in North America

By G. Pechlaner, G. Otero. 2008

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f37dd1591f8f47f50544c80505db66cccc5d498

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. G. Otero
2. P. McMichael
3. Adanella Rossi
4. H. Renting
5. M. Schermer
6. H. Bernstein
7. Jan Douwe van der Ploeg
8. T. Marsden

In Molecular Biology

1. P. McMichael
2. G. Otero

In Plant Science

1. P. McMichael
2. G. Otero
3. H. Renting
4. M. Schermer
5. Adanella Rossi
6. H. Bernstein
7. A. Akram‐Lodhi

Citations in the corpus

• A food regime analysis of the ‘world food crisis’ (2009, background): “17 Colloquially it has been called the 'neoliberal food regime' (Pechlaner and Otero 2008), but in fact this designation obscures the subsidized agricultural surpluses of the North versus the liberalized and unprotected agricultures of the South.”
• Neoliberal Globalization, NAFTA, and Migration: Mexico's Loss of Food and Labor Sovereignty (2011, background): “And yet, the WTO has failed to break the protectionist barriers that the richer countries continue to have around their agriculture industries ( Pechlaner & Otero, 2008 , 2010 ).”
• Building Food Democracy: Exploring Civic Food Networks and Newly Emerging Forms of Food Citizenship (2012, background): “The author has written on this favourable regulatory environment elsewhere (for example, see Pechlaner and Otero, 2008; Pechlaner, 2010, 2012).”
• Towards a third food regime: behind the transformation (2009, unknown): “The sovereign wealth fund sees land in the South as a source of food security, or as a productive resource which can be used to produce bio-fuels for domestic consumers (Addison 2009).”
• The neoliberal food regime in Latin America: state, agribusiness transnational corporations and biotechnology (2012, methodology): “…biotechnology, including its doubtful economic performance, a strong bias in favour of ATNCs and the limited benefits for smallholder producers or the hungry (Otero and Pechlaner 2005, 2009; McAfee 2008; Otero et al. 2008; Pechlaner and Otero 2008, 2010; Friends of the Earth International 2009).”
• A food regime genealogy (2009, unknown): “Consequently, we argue that, despite the prevailing trends, sufficient local resistance to the technology could modify, or even derail, the technology’s role in individual nations, and, accordingly, in the unfolding food regime as a whole’ (Pechlaner and Otero 2008, 2).”