Towards a third food regime: behind the transformation

By D. Burch, G. Lawrence. 2009

327 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2dd267b79729624b0e305e2152b2378b643eb621

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. J. Clapp
2. S. Isakson
3. Sarah J. Martin
4. Madeleine Fairbairn
5. Alberto Alonso-Fradejas

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. S. Isakson
2. J. Clapp
3. Sarah J. Martin
4. Madeleine Fairbairn
5. Alberto Alonso-Fradejas

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. Isakson
2. J. Clapp
3. Sarah J. Martin
4. Madeleine Fairbairn
5. Alberto Alonso-Fradejas

Citations in the corpus

• Food and finance: the financial transformation of agro-food supply chains (2014, background): “Financial actors are playing an increasingly active role in food retailing (Burch and Lawrence 2009, 2013), food processing (Rossman 2010), commodity trading (Murphy et al. 2012), the determination of food prices and the distribution of agricultural risk (Breger Bush 2012, Ghosh et al. 2012, Spratt…”
• Food crises, food regimes and food movements: rumblings of reform or tides of transformation? (2011, unknown): “1The existence of a third, neoliberal food regime is contested among some food regime theorists – see McMichael (2009), Friedmann (2009) and Burch and Lawrence (2009) for an overview of this debate.”
• Finance for agriculture or agriculture for finance (2015, background): “In particular, the growing role of private financial actors in supermarkets, land investment, commodity and value chains and the food system more generally have received increased attention (Burch and Lawrence 2009; Isakson 2014; Fairbairn 2014).”
• ‘Like gold with yield’: evolving intersections between farmland and finance (2014, background): “McMichael (2012) provides a useful theoretical framework by situating land grabbing in the context of global food regime restructuring (see also Burch and Lawrence 2009). The current land rush, he argues, signals the deepening contradictions of the corporate food regime. It is part of the response t”
• The interconnected challenges for food security from a food regimes perspective: Energy, climate and malconsumption (2013, unknown): “this has begun to constitute a ‘third’ regimewith cause to label it as a ‘corporate food regime’ (McMichael, 2005; Holt-Giménez and Shattuck, 2011; Burch and Lawrence, 2009).”