Does contact with lesbians and gays lead to friendlier attitudes? a two year longitudinal study

By N. Anderssen. 2002

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Reproductive Medicine, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6ee2ba99475eae2189961f842e92faef1a4342f4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Miles Hewstone
2. Gordon Hodson

In Reproductive Medicine

1. Miles Hewstone
2. Gordon Hodson

In Social Psychology

1. Gordon Hodson
2. Miles Hewstone
3. Kristof Dhont
4. R. Crisp
5. Rhiannon N. Turner
6. Rupert Brown
7. Alain Van Hiel
8. Lindsey Cameron

Citations in the corpus

• The Effects of Contact on Sexual Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis (2009, unknown): “For example, as cited by Anderssen (2002), a study conducted by Walderhaugh, Wiig, Pedersen, Stavseng, and Holthe-Berg (2000) found that 74% of their sample was ready to accept an openly gay or lesbian bishop.”
• Advances in Intergroup Contact (2012, background): “Several additional studies support a bidirectional relationship (Anderssen, 2002; Binder et al., 2009; Eller & Abrams, 2003, 2004; Levin, Van Laar, & Sidanius, 2003; Swart et al., 2011).”
• Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes (2007, unknown): “This expectation is supported in research on explicit attitudes towards gay people (Anderssen, 2002; Davies, 2004; Negy & Eisenman, 2005), and may also hold for implicit sexuality attitudes (Dasgupta & Rivera, 2006; Steffens, 2005).”