Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference

By Matthew D. Lieberman, R. Gaunt, Daniel T Gilbert, Yaacov Trope. 2002

474 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This chapter was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS-0074562) and the James S. McDonnell Foundation (JSMF 99-25 CN-QUA.05). We gratefully acknowledge Kevin Kim for technical assistance and Naomi Eisenberger for helpful comments on previous drafts. Correspondence concerning this chapter should be addressed to Matthew Lieberman, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 900951563; email: lieber@ucla.edu. "Knowledge may give weight, but accomplishments give lustre, and many more people see than weigh." Lord Chesterfield, Letters, May 8, 1750

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e2ad89558d8c5ea56502a7649872d09a6ccc1ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

When Teams Agree While Disagreeing: Reflexion and Reflection in Shared Cognition (2015, unknown): “responses (Lieberman et al., 2002).”
Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflexion and reflection in strategic management (2009, background): “…automatic categorization, and empathizing with others, while a reflective system, a more controlled system that developed latterly in evolutionary terms, underpins higher forms of cognition, such as logical reasoning, planning, and hypothetical thinking (Lieberman, 2007; Lieberman et al., 2002).”
Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes. (2007, background): “The X-system, named for the " x " in reflexive (Lieberman et al. 2002, Satpute & Lieberman 2006), corresponds roughly to an automatic social cognition system (see Table 1).”
Dual Process Theories in Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics: a Critical Review (2019, background): “The psychological evidence in support of nudging comes directly from classic texts in the DPT literature (e.g., Chaiken and Trope 1999; Lieberman et al. 2002) as well as from the heuristics and biases research itself (e.”
Two Is Not Always Better Than One (2009, unknown): “Lieberman, Gaunt, Gilbert, & Trope, 2002; Loewenstein & O'Donoghue 2005; Sloman,”