Structural Equation Modeling for Social and Personality Psychology
By R. Hoyle. 2011
223 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d41101e7666e01c27e19edcad2e588be90f34de
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Mindfulness at Work: Positive Affect, Hope, and Optimism Mediate the Relationship Between Dispositional Mindfulness, Work Engagement, and Well-Being (2015, unknown): “However, as we are dealing with an area of research still in its infancy, with little empirical evidence to build on, an exploratory post hoc model fit appeared useful for guiding future research (Byrne 2010; Hoyle 2011).”
- Fostering Parasocial Relationships with Celebrities on Social Media: Implications for Celebrity Endorsement (2017, background): “The social media interactions variable was incorporated in a composite variable due to the number of items for social media interactions being inappropriately small (there were only two items) for the creation of a latent variable (Hoyle, 2011).”
- Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: an updated review (2016, methodology): “, p value, R(2), standard errors) are of equal importance as the overall fit indices because they explain the validity and reliability of each path, providing evidence for when the overall fit is poor (Kline 2010; Hoyle 2011).”