Incremental and Radical Innovation in Coopetition—The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Appropriability

601 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Exploratory and exploitative innovation: To what extent do the dimensions of individual level absorptive capacity contribute? (2017, background): “…that individuals play a key role in open innovation (Salter, et al., 2014a, 2014b), most of the literature has focused on the organizational (e.g., Ferreras-Méndez et al., 2016; Heil and Enkel, 2015; Ritala and Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, 2013) rather than the individual level (Salter et al., 2014a).”
Knowledge sharing, knowledge leaking and relative innovation performance: An empirical study (2015, background): “In terms of inter-organizational relationships, scholars have widely recognized the dilemma of knowledge sharing and leakage (Baughn et al., 1997; Hamel, 1991; Heiman and Nickerson, 2004; Ritala and Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, 2013).”
Evolutionary or revolutionary business model innovation through coopetition? The role of dominance in network markets (2016, background): “However, more recently scholars have been placing emphasis on studies that examine firms simultaneously engaging in cooperation and competition (see Bengtsson & Kock, 2014; Ritala & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, 2013).”
External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms (2017, background): “Thus, AC facilitates the creation of radical innovations by enabling the exchange of existing knowledge and learning, and combining it with new sources of knowledge (Ritala & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, 2013).”