A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science
By Juhani Iivari. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2007
617 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83564eb75c1f8f8fd9435f8f61237f24bf943791
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Shirley Gregor
- Steven L. Alter
- Maung Kyaw Sein
- Alan R. Hevner
- Leona Chandra Kruse
- Ola Henfridsson
- Sandeep Purao
- Stefan Seidel
Citations in the corpus
- Work System Theory: Overview of Core Concepts, Extensions, and Challenges for the Future (2013, background): “The pragmatic-design camp, exemplified by Nunamaker, Chen, & Purdin (1990-91), March and Smith (1995), Hevner, March, Park, and Ram (2004), and Iivari (2007), is seen as agnostic to the need for design theory”.”
- Action Design Research (2011, methodology): “For instance, Iivari (2007b) argues that AR and DR differ historically, practically, ontologically, and epistemologically, as well as methodologically.”
- Research Perspectives: The Anatomy of a Design Principle (2020, background): “Histories of design research in information systems can be found in Iivari (2007) and March and Storey (2008).”
- A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems (2013, background): “From a philosophical foundations perspective, taxonomies are forms of conceptual knowledge in the epistemology of design science (Iivari, 2007), which also includes descriptive knowledge and prescriptive knowledge.”
- The Three Cycle View of Design Science (2007, background): “Juhani Iivari’s essay (Iivari 2007) is an important and insightful contribution to a clearer understanding of the key properties of the design science research paradigm—ontology, epistemology, methods, and ethics.”
- Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research (2012, background): “The clarification and comparison will be made with the aid of paradigmatic constituents such as assumptions concerning ontology, epistemology, methodology and researcher–practice relations (Orlikowski & Baroudi, 1991; Goles & Hirschheim, 2000; Iivari, 2007).”
- Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research (2008, background): “Design science research is increasingly recognized as an equal companion to behavioral science research in the information systems field (Hevner 2007; Iivari 2007).”