Doctoral Programs: Changing High Rates of Attrition.

By R. L. Smith, K. Maroney, Kaye W. Nelson, A. Abel, Holly Abel. 2006

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6cbe5c0d310c2f486b4c3ecedc335f68e8089b41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Amanda J. Rockinson-Szapkiw
2. Lucinda S. Spaulding

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Amanda J. Rockinson-Szapkiw
2. Lucinda S. Spaulding

Citations in the corpus

• Hearing their voices: Factors doctoral candidates attribute to their persistence (2012, background): “Research suggests that candidates receiving funding (e.g., scholarships, assistantships, fellowships) experience lower levels of stress than those without funding (McAlpine & Norton, 2006); however, stress management programs and seminars are also effective (Smith et al., 2006).”