Strategic Governance: how to assess board effectiveness in guiding strategy execution

By Sascha L. Schmidt, M. Brauer. 2006

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c43a67b3bb54c527597e6f7dd38c7073b3ed19d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

Citations in the corpus

Board members’ contribution to strategic decision-making in small firms (2007, unknown): “however excluded. It also excludes a new strategy formulation from board strategic involvement, which some researchers disagree with (Henke 1986; Schmidt and Bauer 2006; Stiles and Taylor 2002).”
Making strategy work: A literature review on the factors influencing strategy implementation (2010, unknown): “28 Based on the study of Skivington and Daft (1991), Noble (1999b) reviews strategy implementation research from a structural view (emphasizing organizational structure and control mechanisms) and an interpersonal process view (emphasizing strategic consensus, autonomous strategic behaviors, diffusi”
Board involvement in strategy : advancing the governance of sport organizations (2009, background): “In defining the strategic role of the board within the corporate setting the dominant scholarly interpretation fuses strategic function with strategy development (Ingley & van der Walt, 2003; Schmidt & Brauer, 2006; Stiles, 2001).”
Corporate governance regulation in Nigeria (2012, background): “Following years of corporate misconducts, many regulatory inquiries and increased shareholder activism, various codes of conduct and regulations are now in place in many countries such as the Preda Code in Italy; the Vienot Report in France; the German Corporate Governance Code amongst others (Schmi”
Good Boards Are Strategic: What Does That Mean for Sport Governance? (2012, methodology): “With regard to evaluation, the accepted work style of the board has ranged from probing management’s evaluation of resource allocations, to simply accepting the evaluation that top management provides (Schmidt & Brauer, 2006; Stiles, 2001).”
Does Ownership Type Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility (2012, background): “These strategic objectives are well documented in the literature (see Daft et al., 2010; Hendry & Kiel, 2004; Knapp, Dalziel, & Lewis, 2011; Schmidt & Brauer, 2006).”