Stereotype Threat: Are Lower Status and History of Stigmatization Preconditions of Stereotype Threat?
By J. Leyens, Michel Désert, J. Croizet, C. Darcis. 2000
261 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b8c3030b4d755e015fab5e3a8059d44afe6a9d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- Crystal L. Hoyt
- Alexandr Lesko
- Jennifer Henderlong Corpus
- N. Ellemers
- Michael Johns
- Caryn J. Block
- Jessi L. Smith
- T. Schmader
In Sociology and Political Science
- N. Ellemers
- Crystal L. Hoyt
- T. Schmader
- Michael Johns
- Jessi L. Smith
- C. Steele
- Jennifer Henderlong Corpus
- Alexandr Lesko
Citations in the corpus
- Clearing the air: identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. (2005, background): “…performance deficits include White men taking a test of natural athletic ability (Stone et al., 1999), men performing an affective processing task (Leyens et al., 2000), elderly people performing memory tasks (Levy, 1996), and people of lower socioeconomic status in France performing…”
- Understanding the Process of Stereotype Threat: A Review of Mediational Variables and New Performance Goal Directions (2004, background): “In a study by Leyens et al. (2000), the authors investigated whether stereotype-threat effects could be produced with a stereotype that was only situationally induced versus a stereotype perpetuated by mainstream society.”
- Discounting the Difficult: How High Math-Identified Women Respond to Stereotype Threat (2006, background): “Their performance suffers when stereotypes of inferiority are made salient, such as when they are subtly told that African Americans have more natural athletic ability (Stone, Lynch, Sjomeling, & Darley, 1999), that women are better at affective processing tasks ( Leyens, Desert, Croizet, & Darcis, ”
- Reversing the Gender Gap in Negotiations: An Exploration of Stereotype Regeneration (2002, background): “Leyens, Desert, Croizet, and Darcis (2000) created a stereotypic expectancy by instructing some people that men (a group typically exempt from stigmatization) performed more poorly on affective tasks.”
- Social Class is Dead. Long Live Social Class! Stereotype Threat among Low Socioeconomic Status Individuals (2007, result): “While this effect has largely been studied with respect to African-Americans (Steele & Aronson, 1995) and women taking math tests (Spencer, Steele, & Quinn, 1999), in the past several years a number of studies have appeared that have produced similar findings with Latinos (Gonzales, Blanton, & Willi”
- Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self-affirmation on women's intellectual performance. (2006, background): “For instance, several studies have shown that the relevance of, or investment in the stereotyped domain, moderates stereotype threat effects (Aronson et al., 1999; Leyens, Desert, Croizet, & Darcis, 2000; Stone et al., 1999).”
- Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat (2002, result): “Despite these findings, a number of other studies have measured anxiety and failed to find what they were looking for (Stone et al., 1999; Leyens et al., 2000; Stangor et al., 1998).”
- Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. (2002, background): “There has been a proliferation of studies in the last 6 years showing the effects of race and gender self-stereotypes on behavior and function (e.g., Leyens, Desert, Croizet, & Darcis, 2000; Steele & Aronson, 1995; Stone, Lynch, Sjomeling, & Darley, 1999).”
- Stereotype Threat in Men on a Test of Social Sensitivity (2005, background): “Although these studies do indeed show that stereotype threat can occur in men, the abilities used by Leyens et al. (2000) and McConnell et al.”