"I Luv U :)!": A Descriptive Study of the Media Use of Individuals in Romantic Relationships

By Sarah M. Coyne, Laura A Stockdale, D. Busby, B. Iverson, David M. Grant. 2011

235 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b7ae8d2072435174f677de7060c165298f1a3ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners (2016, background): “The potentially mediating impact of cell phone conflict (Coyne et al. 2011) and moderating effect of attachment style (Bowlby, 1969) are also investigated to better understand the process by which Pphubbing impacts relationship satisfaction amongst romantic partners.”
Phubbed and Alone: Phone Snubbing, Social Exclusion, and Attachment to Social Media (2017, background): “…date have addressed phubbing-like behavior, and most of these focus specifically on romantic relationships and show that phubbing-like behaviors undermine the perceived quality of romantic relationships (Coyne et al. 2011; Lenhart and Duggan 2014; McDaniel and Coyne 2014; Roberts and David 2016).”
Using Technology to Connect in Romantic Relationships: Effects on Attachment, Relationship Satisfaction, and Stability in Emerging Adults (2013, methodology): “These questions were used in an earlier study related to technology use between partners (Coyne et al., 2011).”
“Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. (2016, background): “The research and theory already mentioned would suggest that technology use can influence a number of key outcomes in romantic relationships (Chesley, 2005; Coyne et al., 2011; Duran, Kelly, & Rotaru, 2011; Elphinston & Noller, 2011; Schade et al., 2013; Turkle, 2012).”
Texting while stressed: Implications for students’ burnout, sleep, and well-being. (2013, background): “Electronic communication is characterized by increased potential for misunderstandings (Coyne et al., 2011), and thus high reliance on text messaging as a form of communication may perpetuate or exacerbate stress in a relationship.”
Technology interference in the parenting of young children: Implications for mothers’ perceptions of coparenting (2016, background): “This implies that although technology can help couples and children to connect (Coyne et al., 2011; Kennedy & Wellman, 2007; Padilla-Walker et al., 2012), technology use—when not directed toward connecting with their family—may also interfere at times in their relationships.”