The Aversion to Lying

By Tobias Lundquist, Tore Ellingsen, Erik Gribbe, Magnus Johannesson. 2009

339 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a85bb3ad53fa6fb08eba94c5eb04d82b2989c5f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Why are Economists so Different? Nature, Nurture and Gender Effects in a Simple Trust Game (2014, neutral): “, 2011), but also report that economists are more selfish and less trustworthy than others (see, e.g., Carter and Irons, 1991; Frank et al., 1993, 1996; Frank and Schulze, 2000; Lundquist et al., 2009).”
Self-Serving Justifications (2015, background): “Moving beyond this external cost-benefit analysis, a growing body of evidence shows people exhibit some level of aversion to behaving unethically, even when their unethical behavior will never be revealed (Fischbacher & Föllmi-Heusi, 2013; Gino et al., 2009; Gneezy, 2005; Hilbig & Hessler, 2013; Lew”
Why do people tell the truth? Experimental evidence for pure lie aversion (2013, background): “In summary, therefore, our data indicates a clear correlation between beliefs and behavior (see also Lundquist et al. 2009 on this), but first-order beliefs already capture this relation, and second-order beliefs do not appear to provide much more insight.”
Why Do We Lie? A Practical Guide To The Dishonesty Literature (2018, background): “Some find that students who are studying economics are more likely to cheat and lie than students with other majors (Bowers, 1964; McCabe and Trevino, 1993; Lundquist et al., 2009; Lewis et al., 2012; Muñoz-Iquierdo et al., 2014).”
Lying Aversion and the Size of the Lie (2018, positive): “2 The experiment by Lundquist et al. (2009) is a good way to understand the outcome dimension.”
Cheating in Mind Games: The Subtlety of Rules Matters (2013, background): “This indicates that some subjects might have avoided both major and minor lies, confirming the pattern shown in Shalvi et al. (2011). In Write-first, significant deviation from the theoretical level of 0.”
Let’s be honest: A review of experimental evidence of honesty and truth-telling (2014, background): “…– while this is contested by Gylfason, Arnardottir, & Kristinsson, 2013), subject major (Childs, 2012), religiousness (Childs, 2012), stake size (Dreber & Johanneson, 2008), the magnitude of the lie and accompanying promises (Lundquist et al., 2009), and the time of day (Kouchaki & Smith, 2014).”
Disguising Lies—Image Concerns and Partial Lying in Cheating Games (2019, background): “…explored various determinants of individual lying aversion such as the payo¤ consequences for the sender and the receiver of the message (Erat and Gneezy, 2012), the form of communication (Lundquist et al., 2009), or anticipated trust of the receiver (Charness and Dufwenberg, 2006; Sutter, 2009).”