Beyond dependence: An identity approach to social power and domination
By Bernd Simon, P. Oakes. 2006
151 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a52ca6ab82ab2c3374707da7966ff6c6ef4734f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- S. Waldzus
- A. Mummendey
- John F. Dovidio
- Michael Wenzel
- April H. Bailey
- Marianne LaFrance
- Michaela Driver
- S. Gaertner
Citations in the corpus
- Is Man the Measure of All Things? A Social Cognitive Account of Androcentrism (2018, background): “Ingroup projection theorists also note that power determines the overall typicality of superordinate social groups (Danbold & Huo, 2017; Wenzel et al., 2007), and Simon and Oakes (2006) suggested that powerful people intentionally position themselves as typical.”
- 8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status (2008, unknown): “We also do not mean to suggest that theories of hierarchy focusing on domination, conflict, or identity, in contrast to our functional account, are not helpful in explaining many phenomena in groups and organizations, such as whose interests have priority and when the hierarchical order is challenge”
- Struggling with Lack: A Lacanian Perspective on Organizational Identity (2009, background): “Social power in this sense is not just domination and control via identity discourse (Simon and Oakes 2006) but, importantly, the power of subjects to amplify lack.”
- Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model (2007, background): “But of course, once such a contestation of reality is won, it is likely to empower the ingroup (see Simon & Oakes, 2006 ; Turner, 2005 ).”
- Editor's Forward to the Article “Psychologists and the Use of Torture in Interrogations” and Invited Comments about That Article (2007, background): “If influence requires creating shared identity as has been argued by Simon and Oakes (2006) , then the task for social scientists will be particularly hard.”