Making REDD work for the poor : a poverty environment partnership (PEP) report

By L. Peskett, D. Huberman, E. Bowen-Jones, G. Edwards, Jessica Brown. 2008

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services (2013, unknown): “Initial estimates of potential income flows to developing countries were as high as $30 billion per year (Peskett et al., 2008).”
The potential ecological costs and cobenefits of REDD: a critical review and case study from the Amazon region (2009, background): “Relatively less attention has focused on how REDD might confer benefits beyond reducing carbon emissions (Peskett et al., 2007; Brown et al., 2008; Peskett et al., 2008).”
Getting REDD to work locally: lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects (2010, background): “REDD, on the other hand, could provide communities with access to new monetary incentives for forest protection and management through the already active carbon market (Peskett et al., 2008).”
The natural fix? The role of ecosystems in climate mitigation: a UNEP rapid response assessment. (2009, background): “The first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol ends in 2012, and international talks began in May 2007 on a subsequent commitment period (Peskett et al. 2008).”
A Revised Conceptual Framework for Payments for Environmental Services (2009, background): “Indeed, such concerns are being addressed in the development of REDD methodologies, as safeguards are likely to be implemented to ensure that REDD has local-level benefits (Peskett et al. 2008).”