The potential ecological costs and cobenefits of REDD: a critical review and case study from the Amazon region

By Claudia M. Stickler, Daniel C. Nepstad, Michael T. Coe, D. Mcgrath, Hermann Rodrigues, Wayne S. Walker, Britaldo Silveira Soares-Filho, Eric Davidson. 2009

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7000a20bcbc98eccd6e25f0b88157788661f0ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Ruth S. DeFries
2. B. Cashore
3. Constance L. McDermott

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Ruth S. DeFries
2. Douglas C. Morton
3. Claudia M. Stickler
4. B. Cashore
5. Constance L. McDermott
6. B. Houlton
7. Patrick Meyfroidt

Citations in the corpus

• Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s (2012, methodology): “Based on these metrics, we developed a decision tree classifier using 326 ground data points collected in 2006 (42) to classify cropland, forest, and pasture/ cerrado for each year (Fig.”
• Inductive pattern-based land use/cover change models: A comparison of four software packages (2014, unknown): “…publications.html Soares-Filho et al., 2010: Yanai et al., 2012), the assessment of the co-bene fi ts of REDD (http://www.csr. ufmg.br/dinamica/publications/publications.html Stickler et al., 2009; Nunes et al., 2012) and ROC analysis (Mas et al., 2013).”
• Multi-element regulation of the tropical forest carbon cycle (2011, background): “…negotiations; for example, the United Nations’ Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) program is seen as a path not only to protecting biodiversity, but also to reducing CO2 emissions from deforestation and perhaps to enhancing C sequestration (Stickler et al. 2009).”
• Climate policy co-benefits: a review (2020, background): “…thus call for careful policy design in order to realize co-benefits efficiently (Beaudrot et al., 2016; Bryan et al., 2016; De Beenhouwer et al., 2016; Greve et al., 2013; Panfil & Harvey, 2016; Pichancourt et al., 2014; Stickler et al., 2009; Strassburg et al., 2010; Wüstemann et al., 2017).”
• Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: Current debates on the breadth of REDD+. (2012, background): “For instance, a successful REDD+ may have large impacts on food security [60 ,64], and could require an increase in agricultural productivity [59], which may lead to further ecological impacts through policy feedbacks [65].”