Getting REDD to work locally: lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects

By B. Blom, T. Sunderland, Daniel Murdiyarso. 2010

351 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72766f878aa98dab89d368d1b36466ef978269b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Sven Wunder
2. A. Angelsen
3. E. Corbera
4. Subhrendu K. Pattanayak
5. S. Engel
6. Paul J. Ferraro
7. Julia P. G. Jones
8. A. Pfaff

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. A. Angelsen
2. William D. Sunderlin
3. A. Pfaff
4. Sven Wunder
5. J. Börner
6. Subhrendu K. Pattanayak
7. R. Lapeyre
8. Erin Sills

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Sven Wunder
2. A. Angelsen
3. E. Corbera
4. Paul J. Ferraro
5. Subhrendu K. Pattanayak
6. S. Engel
7. J. Börner
8. A. Pfaff

Citations in the corpus

• The importance of local forest benefits: Economic valuation of Non-Timber Forest Products in the Eastern Arc Mountains in Tanzania (2014, neutral): “…solutions that improve human welfare in the short term and conserve nature are hard to realise in practice (Adams et al., 2004; McShane et al., 2010), and often trade-off decisions between ecosystem conservation and economic development have to be made (Sachs et al., 2009; Blom et al., 2010).”
• Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments: what works and what doesn't? (2012, background): “Integrated conservation and development projects (ICDP) are widespread project-based interventions that aim to tackle directly the links between natural resource dependence, conservation, and poverty (Blom et al., 2010).”
• Can REDD+ social safeguards reach the ‘right’ people? Lessons from Madagascar (2016, background): “Elite capture of benefits is a well-documented problem in community-based conservation and development projects around the world (Blom et al., 2010; Corbera and Pascual, 2012; Pascual et al., 2014; Platteau and Gaspart, 2003).”
• REDD+ on the ground: A case book of subnational initiatives across the globe (2014, background): “‘Performance’ is what distinguishes REDD+ initiatives from other conservation efforts (Blom et al. 2010).”
• Mainstreaming Impact Evaluation in Nature Conservation (2016, background): “Empirical evidence is even more sparse on the effectiveness and implementation costs of other large- and small-scale conservation policy instruments, such as forest law enforcement, PES schemes, ecocertification, and Integrated Conservation and Development approaches that dominate public and private”
• Relationships between tree species diversity and above-ground biomass in Central African rainforests: implications for REDD (2013, background): “…to address biodiversity conservation was recognized during negotiations in the ad hoc Working Group on Long Term Cooperative Action (AWGLCA), when the scope of REDD schemes was broadened to include incentives for a wide array of forest management practices including conservation (Blom et al. 2010).”