Globalization and institutions : redefining the rules of the economic game

254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Globalization of Service Work: Comparative Institutional Perspectives on Call Centers (2009, background): “With few barriers to entry, small capital outlays, off-the-shelf technologies, a technology-vendor and con sulting industry that operates globally (Djelic and Quack 2003; Flecker 2007), and jobs that require modest formal education, call center operations should converge toward a universal system.”
A History of Scandinavian Socially Responsible Investing (2008, background): “Institutional theory has frequently been criticized for emphasizing stability and resilience of social systems (for example nations, industries or organizations), and neglecting dynamics and change (cf. Djelic and Quack, 2003).”
The three faces of China: Strategic alliance partner selection in three ethnic Chinese economies (2014, background): “…and other powerful organizations through various strategies such as seeking financial resources that can be safeguarded from those organizations and aligning with influential actors who have connections and can offer the firm legitimacy (Ahlstrom et al., 2008; Djelic & Quack, 2003; Yang, 2002).”
Sources of Rationalized Governance: Cross-National Longitudinal Analyses, 1985–2002 (2006, background): “In the contemporary world, it is widely recognized that the neoliberal model of proper governance tends to dominate (Jepperson, 2001; Schofer and Fourcade-Gourinchas, 2002; Sahlin-Andersson and Engwall, 2002; Djelic and Quack, 2003).”