Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic aspects of humor and gender in the workplace
By Janet Holmes. 2006
320 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/686752bbb73ef53dba5eee1d9e5fca3bf482d553
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- T. Nikko
- Helena Kangasharju
- D. Glew
- Jessica Mesmer-Magnus
- Tomas Krilavičius
- C. Viswesvaran
- Justina Mandravickaite
- A. Shirom
In Literature and Literary Theory
- T. Nikko
- Helena Kangasharju
- D. Glew
- Jessica Mesmer-Magnus
- Tomas Krilavičius
- C. Viswesvaran
- Justina Mandravickaite
- A. Shirom
In Social Psychology
- Helena Kangasharju
- D. Glew
- Jessica Mesmer-Magnus
- Tomas Krilavičius
- T. Nikko
- C. Viswesvaran
- Justina Mandravickaite
- A. Shirom
Citations in the corpus
- Emotions in Organizations (2009, background): “According to Holmes, much of the research on humor in the workplace focuses on demonstrating its contribution to organizational goals such as improving job performance and satisfaction, encouraging creativity, or defusing conflict among workers (Homes, 2000, p. 160; Holmes, 2006, p. 29).”
- A meta‐analysis of positive humor in the workplace (2012, background): “Research suggests humor may promote team cohesion via increased group harmony, collegiality, and inter-member attractiveness (Holmes, 2006; Stogdill, 1972), as well as by operating as a social lubricant (Morreall, 1991) that helps build group consensus and allows the group to withdraw momentarily…”
- Stylometric Analysis of Parliamentary Speeches: Gender Dimension (2017, background): “Gender influence on language usage have been extensively studied (Lakoff, 1973; Holmes, 2006; Holmes, 2013; Argamon et al., 2003) without fully reaching a common agreement.”